By Robert Berg
Summary: Deep-Sea Corals Workshop
J. J. McDonough and K. A. Puglise
NOAA Research – NOAA’s Undersea Research Program and Office of Ocean Exploration NOAA Fisheries – Office of Science and Technology
In cooperation with the Marine Institute, Ireland, and participating organizations
NOAATechnical Memorandum NMFS-SPO-60 June 2003
U.S. Department of Commerce Donald L. Evans, Secretary
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Vice Admiral Conrad C. Lautenbacher, Jr., USN (Ret.) Under Secretary for Oceans and Atmosphere
National Marine Fisheries Service William T. Hogarth, Assistant Administrator for Fisheries
Deep-Sea Corals Workshop –Summary Report
This document summarizes the proceedings of the Deep-Sea Corals Workshop held in Galway, Ireland on January 16-17, 2003. The workshop was hosted by the Irish Marine Institute (MI) and organized by the U.S. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA). This workshop builds on the growing collaboration between MI and NOAA under the Joint Statement of Understanding (JSU) signed by the two institutions in 1995. Efforts undertaken through the JSU include research on commercially important ground fish species, research to predict harmful algal bloom occurrences, oceanographic modeling, and the exchange of ideas and information on new technologies. This workshop represents how the JSU continues to evolve in response to emerging issues of joint concern.
NOAA and MI wish to thank all the individuals and organizations that participated in the two-day workshop. We hope the time and effort committed to this workshop will result in increased collaboration between countries and institutions with interests in understanding more about deep-sea coral ecosystems.
We would like to extend a special thank you to M. Bohan, S. Brown, R. Brock, A. Grehan, K. Heron, L. Oremland, M. O’Cinneide, A. Shepard, and G. O’Sullivan for their assistance in planning and executing the Deep-Sea Corals Workshop and for their insightful editorial comments on the Deep-Sea Corals Summary Report.
Deep-Sea Corals Workshop Participants
| Executive Summary | iv | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| I. | Introduction | 1 | |
| II. | Background | 2 | |
| III. | Developing an International Deep-Sea Corals Action Plan | 4 | |
| IV. | Developing a State of the Deep-Sea Corals Report | 7 | |
| V. | Common Themes | 8 | |
| VI. | Collaborative Projects | 12 | |
| VII. | A Proposed International Transatlantic Expedition | 14 | |
| VIII. Potential Actions and Next Steps | 17 | ||
| IX. | Additional Information Needs | 20 | |
| X. | Conclusions | 23 | |
| Appendix A: Deep-Sea Corals Workshop Agenda | 24 | ||
| Appendix B: Common Themes and Critical Information Needs | 26 | ||
| Appendix C: Project Descriptions | 40 | ||
| Appendix D: Participant List | 49 | ||
Deep-Sea Corals Workshop –Summary Report
Overview – On January 16-17, 2003, a group of deep-sea coral researchers met in Galway, Ireland to discuss the need for an International Deep-Sea Corals Action Plan, identify critical information needs to increase our understanding of these unique and fragile habitats, and identify collaborative efforts to help meet those critical needs. Representatives from eight countries including Belgium, Canada, Germany, Ireland, Norway, Sweden, the United Kingdom, and the United States attended the workshop. Each of these countries has a vested interest in deep-sea coral research and management.
The workshop was hosted by the Irish Marine Institute and was organized by the
U.S. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, and represents the continuation of a collaborative partnership between the two institutions that began in 1995. Over the years, the partnership has provided an opportunity for joint activities focusing on a variety of environmental concerns including fisheries management, harmful algal events, oceanographic modelling, and seabed mapping through remote sensing. The issue of deep-sea corals is a recent addition to the growing body of work shared by Ireland and the United States.
Critical Information Needs –Participants identified critical information needs related to three categories: 1) locating and mapping deep-sea corals; 2) understanding more about coral biology and ecology; and 3) using specific deep-sea coral species as indicators of climate change. These needs, if met, would enhance our knowledge of the distribution and function of deep-sea coral habitats and the threats they face. The following outlines these information needs as identified by three breakout groups.
Mapping – This group identified two critical information needs for locating and characterizing deep-sea coral habitat, including a list of criteria for focusing mapping efforts. First, low-resolution maps (>10m pixel size) are required to identify broad areas that may contain deep-sea corals. These mapping efforts should focus on areas that are being considered for marine protective status, areas that are suspected to contain deep-sea coral habitat based on existing information, and deepwater areas that are being intensively used by the fishing and oil and gas industries. Priority areas are in:
¾ North America -- the southern West
Florida Shelf in the Gulf of Mexico,
suspected Lophelia banks off the
northeastern coast of Florida and
Georgia, the Grand Banks; and in
¾ Europe – Skaggerak, Sweden; and
the French Canyon heads.
Second, high-resolution maps (<10m pixel size) are required to provide a baseline for characterizing areas of known deep-sea coral habitat. Priority areas are in:
¾ North America --Lophelia banks off
the coast of North Carolina,
Stellwagen Bank off the coast of
Massachusetts, the Northeast
Passage; and in
¾ Europe -- Rockall Bank, Ireland and
West Reef, Norway.
Biology and Ecology – This group identified three critical information needs that would improve our knowledge of the deep-sea corals themselves, the factors that influence their growth, reproduction, and distribution, and how communities of corals function as habitat for fish and invertebrates. First, the development of a comprehensive species inventory is required to establish a baseline for habitat characterization efforts. This will require collecting species from multiple locations and ensuring that taxonomic experts are available for species identification and classification.
Second, studies on growth and reproduction are required to better understand the life history of individual species, as well as the full effects of the threats they face. The group recommended that studies should focus on samples collected from a variety of locations and water depths, and selected some potential sampling areas including the northeast Gulf of Mexico, the Blake Plateau, the Gulf of Maine, the Porcupine Bight, and the Trondhjem Fjord in the Norwegian Sea.
Critical Information Needs
Mapping:
Biology and Ecology:
Paleoclimate Analysis:
Third, research on food web and species interactions is required to better understand how deep-sea corals function as habitat. There is a need to understand the role such habitat plays in terms of the life histories of individual species, as well as in support of biodiversity. The group recommended that these efforts build on current research, and include areas from the Gulf of Mexico to the Norwegian Sea to identify potential latitudinal differences in how species utilize deep-sea coral habitats.
Paleoclimate Analysis – This group identified three critical information needs that would allow researchers to better identify and understand past changes in climate (including triggers of climate change), and to develop more refined models for predicting future climate change. Deep-sea corals provide a unique record of temperature changes at a higher resolution than sediment cores (e.g. ± 1 year for deep-sea corals vs. ± 500 years for sediment cores). First, high-quality oceanographic data are required along the Gulf Stream and associated currents to better understand existing conditions as related to climate and corals.
Second, there is a need to collect coral samples for paleoclimate analysis from discrete areas along the Gulf Stream and associated currents to better understand the relationship between past oceanographic currents and the growth rates of corals. Specific sampling areas include the Blake Plateau, Orphan Knoll, the Northeast Channel, Rockall Trough, Lofoten Islands, Hatton Bank, Sedlo Seamount, Seine Seamount, and the Faroes-Shetlands Channel.
Third, there is a need to conduct controlled growth experiments to calibrate geochemical signals and relevant water mass properties. The species collected could come from any area. However, the experiments would require a high quality saltwater aquarium, laboratories capable of multiple dating
techniques, and staff with advanced analytical skills.
Collaborative Projects – After identifying critical information needs, participants identified and described collaborative projects for the coming year and for the future that would help collect information for meeting these needs. Projects include existing, funded efforts, and “new ideas.” Collaborative projects consist of short-term and long-term opportunities, such as available berth space on a funded research cruise or planning joint research expeditions. See the table below for an outline of some of the basic information generated on these projects:
# Projects Theme # Projects
| United States Canada Europe Canada/Europe United States/Europe All Regions | 51141 64 | 2003 Multiyear Future | 10 11 10 | Mapping Biology/Ecology Paleoclimate Multidisciplinary | 111631 |
|---|
Geographic coverage, timing, and theme of potential collaborative projects.
A Proposed International Transatlantic Expedition – Participants identified objectives for a potential International Transatlantic Expedition to explore and research deep-sea coral habitats in relation to the Gulf Stream and associated currents. The expedition could occur in 2005, and would consist of integrated, multidisciplinary cruises using common protocols and procedures for collecting and analyzing information. Emphasis would be given to meeting the critical needs identified by this workshop
Transatlantic Expedition Objectives
Research:
Education & Outreach:
On January 16-17, 2003, a group of deep-sea coral researchers met in Galway, Ireland to discuss the need for an International Deep-Sea Corals Action Plan, identify critical information needs to increase our understanding of these unique and fragile habitats, and identify collaborative efforts to help meet these critical needs (See Appendix A for the workshop agenda). Representatives from eight countries including Belgium, Canada, Germany, Ireland, Norway, Sweden, the United Kingdom, and the United States attended the workshop (See Appendix D for a list of participants). Each of these countries has an interest in deep-sea coral research and management.
The Deep-Sea Corals Workshop was a direct result of an existing collaboration between the U.S. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) and the Irish Marine Institute (MI) who have recognized that these slow growing corals provide essential habitat for fish and invertebrates, may act as sources of biodiversity, provide novel bio-compounds for use in the biotechnology industries, and serve as climate change indicators. This workshop was an outgrowth of the Deep-Sea Corals Collaboration Planning Meeting held in Tampa, Florida on November 14, 2002, in which the objectives were to: (1) identify common themes of research among deep-sea coral researchers; (2) become acquainted with the international community of deep-sea coral researchers; (3) discuss potential areas of collaboration; and (4) make plans for a follow-up meeting. The Deep-Sea Corals Workshop was held to further assess the critical needs associated with the common themes and to identify areas of future collaboration.
Significant progress was made during the two-day workshop, and participants were able to identify some of the most critical needs related to: locating and mapping deep-sea corals; understanding more about coral biology and ecology; and using specific deep-sea coral species as indicators of climate change. Progress was also made in identifying future projects and field operations that can help meet these information needs. Real time products and outcomes achieved during the workshop include:
The information collected at the workshop will help lay the foundation for collective and collaborative action. However, much work remains to be done. The following is a detailed report that summarizes the hard work of the workshop participants and provides recommendations for “next steps.”
1
In comparison to their tropical counterparts, the state of knowledge on cold, deep-sea corals is minimal. Scientists still know little about deep-sea coral distribution, biology, and their function as essential fish and invertebrate habitat. Recently, interest has been building among the scientific community and the public to determine the role of these “forests beneath the sea” and their relation to commercial fisheries.
Deep-sea corals consist of both scleractinians (stony corals) and gorgonians (soft branching corals) and are found in the dark, cold oceanic waters worldwide. They are fragile, long-lived, and slow growing, thus making them extremely vulnerable to physical disturbance.
Human activities pose the most significant threat to deep-sea corals. Slow growing coral species may live for centuries, yet be destroyed in seconds by human activities such as trawling, dredging, and natural resource exploration. Destructive fishing practices have been shown to remove coral forests, and leave rubble behind which has far less value as essential fish habitat.
Although deep-sea corals are found in all of the world’s oceans, the workshop focused on the deep-sea corals along the Gulf Stream current, which begins in the Gulf of Mexico and ends in the Northern Atlantic Ocean (Figure 1). The workshop focal point was on the deep-sea corals of the Atlantic Ocean, not because they are more important, but because this workshop developed out of a burgeoning relationship between NOAA and MI. The hope is that lessons learned from concentrating on the Atlantic Ocean can be applied to other locations where deep-sea corals are found.
One of the outcomes of the workshop was a “Statement of Need” that was collectively penned by the researchers attending the Deep-Sea Corals Workshop. In the Statement of Need, workshop attendees declared the importance of deep-sea corals, the potential threats to their existence, the need to increase public awareness about deep-sea corals, and to engage with industry and resource managers to develop strategies for sustainable management of the corals.
2
A workshop was held on January 16-17, 2003 in Galway, Ireland as part of an on-going collaboration between the U.S. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) and the Irish Marine Institute (MI), to bring together leading cold-water coral experts from the United States, Canada, Norway, Sweden, Germany, Belgium, the United Kingdom and Ireland, to begin formulating an International Deep-Sea Coral Action Plan.
Spectacular underwater video and photographs of deep, cold-water corals in Norway and off the west coast of Ireland have revealed a fascinating world of coral gardens, reefs, and giant carbonate mounds which support an amazing array of marine life. These are distinct from shallow tropical corals as they occur in dark frigid oceanic waters (> 100 meters) often beyond the continental shelf break and fjord waters. Now countries all around the Atlantic are beginning to explore the distribution of these important ecosystems that appear to be connected by common ocean margin characteristics and the uniting influence of the Gulf Stream.
Pioneering studies have shown that cold-water corals are outstanding examples of marine natural heritage, essential habitats for fish, as major biodiversity hot-spots in the deep-sea, as potential sources of novel bio-compounds of use in the pharmaceutical and biotechnology industries, and in medicine, and as climate change indicators.
Cold-water corals are long-lived, slow-growing, fragile, and vulnerable to physical disturbance. The rapid expansion in deep-sea fishing and oil and gas exploration now threatens the very survival of these complex habitats. Scientists have documented widespread damage to corals off Canada, the United States, and Norway resulting from the destructive effects of using trawling equipment.
International scientists participated in the Galway meeting due to a shared responsibility and mounting concerns over the rapid loss of cold water-coral habitats (many of which have existed for 1000s of years). A process has begun to identify and prioritize the research required to unlock the secrets of these ecosystems and to underpin international conservation initiatives required to ensure the long-term viability of these ecosystems. A concerted effort is also being undertaken to increase public awareness of the plight of deep, cold-water corals and to engage with industry and resource managers to develop strategies for sustainable management of the corals.
The problems facing coral ecosystems are similar in every country so the Action Plan under development will identify opportunities to pool resources, share expertise, and exchange data to rapidly increase our scientific understanding of the ecosystem, which will form the basis for advice to policy makers and resource managers on both sides of the Atlantic.
3
While deep-sea coral habitats exist within the exclusive economic zones (EEZs) and other political boundaries of several nations, many can be found in areas outside of national jurisdictions. Given the fragile nature of these corals and their ecological importance, an International Deep-Sea Corals Action Plan would provide a blueprint for participating countries to collaborate on exploration, mapping, research, public awareness, and management of deep-sea corals in international waters. Suc h an international action plan would also guide efforts to manage human activities that have a negative effect on deep-sea coral habitats in international waters; enable member nations to address similar issues and problems in a systematic manner; establish consistency in scientific methodology and data collection; improve information exchange; and enable participating nations to pool resources to address critical needs. An International Deep-Sea Corals Action Plan may also provide grounds to establish an international deep-sea corals “Marine Protected Area” (MPA) on the high seas – a concept that was discussed a number of times during the workshop as a potential long-term target.
An International Deep-Sea Corals Action Plan will not replace or duplicate existing collaborative efforts in specific regions. In contrast, it may provide additional incentive and support for efforts that are currently struggling due to a lack of funding and other resources.
Europe – Currently, much of the international environmental work in Europe is being conducted under the “Sixth European Union Framework Programme” (EU FP6). Specific activities under EU FP6 related to deep-sea corals are guided by the “Atlantic Coral Ecosystem Study” (ACES), which coordinates research, management, and legislative activities related to deep-sea coral habitat that are conducted by member countries. Significant progress on locating, mapping, and characterizing deep-sea coral habitat has been made easier under the EU ACES Project and by the Irish National Seabed Survey, which has mapped the Irish EEZ equivalent from 200 m out to 4000 m.
Canada – Dalhousie University in Halifax, Nova Scotia is currently developing a proposal to establish a Deep-Sea Coral Research Network to guide research and management efforts related to deep-sea coral habitat. The proposal addresses four major topics: 1) high-resolution paleoclimate studies using deep-sea corals as a proxy for temperature changes; 2) chemical and biological studies of deep-sea corals; 3) the ecology of deep-sea coral habitats and the effects of fishing; and 4) education and public outreach. While the emphasis is on locating and understanding more about deep-sea coral habitats in Canadian waters, the intention of the network is to formalize collaborations with scientists in Europe and the United States. The Canadian workshop participant has indicated that the proposal was well received, and anticipates funding to support approximately five years of activity.
4
United States – Deep-sea coral exploration, research, and management in U.S. waters are scattered among numerous agencies and institutions, and has trouble competing with shallow, temperate and tropical coral reef priorities. Efforts to locate and characterize deep-sea coral habitats within NOAA are funded through three NOAA line offices: NOAA Fisheries, NOAA Research [through the Office of Ocean Exploration (OE) and NOAA’s Undersea Research Program (NURP)], and NOAA’s Ocean and Coasts. Other federal and state agencies (including the U.S. Geological Survey and Minerals Management Service), as well as public and private institutions also conduct deep-sea coral work. An International Deep-Sea Corals Action Plan could provide an incentive for improving the coordination of U.S. efforts.
During the workshop, participants reviewed a potential framework (Figure 2) for developing, implementing, and evaluating the effectiveness of an International Deep-Sea Corals Action Plan that would require the participation and interaction of scientists, natural resource managers, and educators. The framework outlines a phased approach that would allow participants to develop, assess, and prioritize specific actions (strategies) based on the best available information on deep-sea coral distribution, health, and perceived threats. The framework also includes an evaluation phase that would be conducted once actions are being implemented, which would allow participants to modify their actions based on whether or not they were effective.
The proposed framework also provides a description of specific actions that could be undertaken to develop the International Deep-Sea Corals Action Plan, as well as some methods that could be used to organize participants. Specifically, it was recognized that if such an action plan is to be constructed, it would require the establishment of: 1) working groups made up of representatives from each participating nation that would be responsible for implementing each phase and developing interim products; 2) an advisory group (or groups) that would review products and progress; and 3) formal mechanisms for making decisions and approving actions.
Upon reviewing and discussing the proposed framework, participants recognized the need to look within their individual institutions and organizations to generate formal support. It was also recognized that particular efforts such as assembling and organizing existing information on deep-sea corals, developing interim products such as a State of the Deep-Sea Corals Report, and conducting collaborative field work during the upcoming field season (2003) need not wait for a formal International Deep-Sea Corals Action Plan. In fact, many of these efforts could be conducted under existing institutional arrangements, and the results could be used to further the development of an International Deep-Sea Corals Action Plan.
5
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
| PHASE | ACTIVITIES |
| Problem and Issue Identification | • Description of Common Themes • Identification of Information Gaps |
| Characterization of Problems and Issues | • State of Deep-Sea Corals Report |
| Strategy Development | • Establish Goals & Objectives • Characterize: - existing efforts - existing programs - existing plans • Identify Leveraged Actions • Identify New Ideas |
| Assessment and Prioritization of Strategies | • Assess Perceived Effects • Assess Costs • Assess Institutional Arrangements • Establish Priorities |
| Action Plan Development | • Identify Specific Activities • Identify Roles & Responsibilities • Identify True Costs (range) • Identify Funding Sources • Formalize Agreements • Delegate Authority |
| Implementation | • Research • Exploration • Surveying and Mapping • Education • Outreach • Management |
| Evaluation | • Evaluate Effectiveness • Recharacterize Problems & Issues • Support Existing Strategies • Develop New Strategies |
METHODS TIME
to DecisionMakers
Figure 2. Proposed framework to develop, implement, and evaluate the effectiveness of an International Deep-Sea Corals Action Plan.
6
The location, distribution, status, and health of deep-sea coral habitats are poorly understood. Even for those areas where reefs have been well mapped and filmed, little is known about how the species function together as a community, and as habitat for fish and invertebrates. In addition to the challenges that scientists face in accessing these areas, even less is known about how these habitats may change over time. Therefore, as an initial step toward developing an International Deep-Sea Corals Action Plan, participants at the workshop discussed preparing a State of the Deep-Sea Corals Report. Participants agreed that such a report could help organize existing knowledge on these habitats, the perceived threats that they currently face, and elucidate critical information required for making informed management decisions.
As with the discussion of an International Deep-Sea Corals Action Plan, participants debated the potential contents and scope of the report, and agreed that it would be worthwhile to prepare a well-organized, streamlined report, a document that would provide users with a quick overview of the most salient information available. Participants also recognized that the work conducted at the workshop on further describing the common themes related to deep-sea corals – locating and mapping habitat, conducting research on biology and ecology, and assessing deep-sea coral species as indicators of climate change – represents an initial effort toward developing the report. However, no agreement was reached on an outline, or on how to proceed in preparing the report.
Given this situation, the following outline is presented by NOAA as a potential method for developing a State of the Deep-Sea Corals Report:
7
Prior to the Deep-Sea Coral Collaborative Planning Meeting held in Tampa, Florida on November 14, 2002, deep-sea coral research profiles were requested from anticipated meeting participants. Preliminary common themes were identified based on these profiles, including: 1) mapping the distribution of deep-sea corals; 2) ecology of organisms associated with deep-sea corals; 3) physiology of deep-sea corals – indicators and response to change; 4) taxonomic studies; and 5) paleo-retrospective analyses. Common themes were developed as focal points for future discussion regarding the status of deep-sea corals research.
For the workshop, the original five common themes were condensed into three themes: (1) Mapping; (2) Biology and Ecology (including the former common themes of ecology, physiology, and taxonomy as subtopics); and (3) Paleoclimate Analysis. Additionally, participants had the opportunity to edit, rewrite as appropriate, and come to consensus regarding the common themes and overview statements at the workshop (see Appendix B for full descriptions of the overview statements).
Working in three groups, participants were tasked with identifying and prioritizing critical information needs within each theme. Participants identified 26 distinct information needs – Mapping (7), Biology and Ecology (17), Paleoclimate Analysis (5) – some as specific as gathering data on the impacts of new optical scanning technologies, to others such as data from hydrographic surveys that would provide a foundation for future research and management efforts. Of these, 8 were identified as “critical” and requiring immediate attention– Mapping (2), Biology and Ecology (3), Paleoclimate Analysis (3). Table 1 lists the information needs identified by each group.
8
Table 1. Information needs identified by the participants.
| Group 1 - Mapping |
|---|
| * Low-resolution large-scale surveys |
| * High-resolution site-specific surveys |
| Monitoring data |
| Specimens |
| Optical survey impact data |
| Spatial information on research gaps |
| Development of acoustic survey methods |
| Group 2 - Biology and Ecology |
| Information on how Lophelia functions as habitat |
| Data on deep-sea corals faunal associations |
| Colonization and dispersal data |
| Data on larval biology |
| Data on reproductive ecology |
| * Data on coral growth rates and limiters |
| Data on symbiotic relationships |
| Molecular markers for recruitment studies |
| Reef succession |
| Recolonization of disturbed areas |
| Habitat preferences |
| * Data on food web -trophodynamics |
| Biodiversity data and estimates |
| Thermal physiology |
| Species identification and descriptions |
| Monitoring data |
| * Development of taxonomic tools and expertise |
| Group 3 - Paleoclimate Analysis |
| Low-resolution large-scale surveys |
| High-resolution site-specific surveys |
| * Specimens |
| * Time-series data of hydrographic changes |
| * Controlled growth experiments |
* = “Critical Information Needs” addressed in detail by workshop participants.
9
The information needs identified by the participants can be classified under seven categories that represent a means for designing multidisciplinary efforts that could be applied to locating deep-sea coral habitats, developing a base-level characterization, and learning more about their function and health.
For the purposes of this workshop, Critical Information Needs (identified by an asterisk in Table 1) were defined as those that the participants should spend more time characterizing and understanding. Specifically, participants were asked to characterize each Critical Information Need in terms of:
Geography – Where do we need to focus our efforts? Technology – What types of technology are required to meet the need? Timing and Duration – When should information be collected and how often? Users – Who needs the information? Critical Contributors – What institutions are critical to meeting this information need?
10
Appendix B provides a detailed overview of the work accomplished on the Critical Information Needs, while Tables 2 and 3 list each Critical Information Need and summarize the suggested target areas and required technologies:
Table 2. Target areas for focusing efforts to meet Critical Information Needs. Geographic regions are identified where participants would like to obtain maps, samples, and conduct research. To meet some of these information needs, it is necessary to collect data on a broad scale across all regions. For example, collecting specimens from multiple areas is required for paleoclimate analysis.
Geographic Regions North America Europe
| Critical Information Needs | West Florida Shelf | Gulf of Mexico | South Atlantic Bight | Blake Plateau | NE US and EasternCanada | Ireland | Norwegian Sea | Sweden Fjords | Bay of Biscay Slope | Iberian Penninsula | All Regions |
| Group 1 - Mapping | |||||||||||
| Low-resolution large-scale surveys | x | x | x | x | x | ||||||
| High-resolution site-specific surveys | x | x | x | x | |||||||
| Group 2 - Biology and Ecology | |||||||||||
| Data on coral growth and reproduction | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | ||||
| Data on food web and species interactions | x | ||||||||||
| Development of taxonomic tools and a species inventory | x | ||||||||||
| Group 3 - Paleoclimate Analysis | |||||||||||
| Specimens | x | x | x | x | x | ||||||
| Time-series data of hydrographic changes | x | ||||||||||
| Controlled growth experiments | x |
Table 3. Technologies required for collecting Critical Information Needs.
Technology Requirements
| Critical Information Needs | Multibeam | Side-Scan Sonar | Laser Line Scan | Coral Reef IdentificationAlgorithms | Seismic Profilers | Bottom Samplers | Bottom, Mid-water, andSurface Trawls | Subs, ROVs, and AUVs | Benthic Landers | High Quality Video andStill Cameras | Standrad Oceanographicand Water Chemistry | Biological AssessmentInstruments | Lab Facilities andAquaria | Models |
| Group 1 - Mapping | ||||||||||||||
| Low-resolution large-scale surveys | x | x | ||||||||||||
| High-resolution site-specific surveys | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | |||||
| Group 2 - Biology and Ecology | ||||||||||||||
| Data on coral growth and reproduction | x | x | x | x | x | |||||||||
| Data on food web and species interactions | x | x | x | x | x | x | ||||||||
| Development of taxonomic tools and species inventory | x | x | x | x | ||||||||||
| Group 3 - Paleoclimate Analysis | ||||||||||||||
| Specimens | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | |||||||
| Time-series data of hydrographic changes | x | |||||||||||||
| Controlled growth experiments | x | x | x |
11
One of the primary objectives of the workshop was to identify opportunities for scientists to collaborate on field operations and other efforts related to deep-sea corals and associated species. This objective was a continuation of a preliminary list of potential collaborative projects drawn up at the Deep-Sea Corals Collaboration Planning Meeting in Tampa, Florida on November 14, 2002. Given further development of the common themes and the identification of Critical Information Needs within those themes, participants developed a more comprehensive list of collaborative projects that 1) identified existing efforts funded for the upcoming year that provide an opportunity for collaboration; and 2) identified and described future projects with potential for collaboration.
During their discussions, participants identified several types of collaborative efforts (Table 4), which, if undertaken, would provide a solid foundation for continued collaboration and coordination related to exploration, research, education, and management, including data management, technology development, and resource management.
Table 4. Examples of the types of collaborative opportunities.
| Project Type | Description |
| Exploration | Mapping and discovery expeditions; development of exploration “targets”; collaborative product development based on results |
| Research | Research expeditions; international science teams; development of a shared specimen archive; lab work |
| Education and Outreach | Curriculum development; development of interpretive exhibits and displays; use of international media outlets |
| Data Management | Systematic development and use of metadata to ensure data consistency and sharing; development of a GIS-based Atlantic Atlas |
| Technology Development | Development and use of advanced underwater vehicles (AUVs) and sensors; development and use of remote sensing and acoustic instruments |
| Resource Management | Development of management zones on the high-seas; sharing of techniques and strategies for management and restoration |
Appendix C provides an overview and summary of the proposed projects, including a description of each project and its key activities, as well as an accounting of the themes that are addressed and the areas that will be targeted. Of the 31 projects described by participants, 14 are scheduled to occur during 2003 (5-mapping, 7-biology/ecology, 2-multidisciplinary). In addition, there is a distinct emphasis on conducting work in European waters.
Mapping – Participants identified 11 mapping related projects, 5 of which are occurring in 2003. Each project is similar in the application of multibeam technology; ground-truthing the data using remotely operated vehicles (ROVs) or manned submersible video and still cameras, and the collection of sediment and biological samples for analysis. Geographically, there is an emphasis on projects in European waters, with several of the projects proposing to visit more than one area.
12
Biology and Ecology – Participants identified 16 projects focusing on biology, ecology, and taxonomy. Seven of these projects are scheduled for 2003. As with mapping, these projects share similarities in their approach, including: using the best available hydrographic information to identify target areas for study; using a variety of sampling and observation techniques (including ROVs and manned submersibles) to collect specimens of live coral, coral rubble, and associated species; and laboratory analysis. Geographically, there is an emphasis on conducting work in European waters, as well as in the Gulf of Mexico. These projects indicate a growing need and opportunity for establishing consistent methods for addressing similar scientific questions, as well as opportunities for establishing a database and sample archive that would be accessible by all concerned countries and institutions.
Paleoclimate Analysis – Only one project was described for this theme, and would require the collection of voucher specimens of specific species along the Gulf Stream and associated currents. Participants recommended that this be one of the major objectives of the proposed International Transatlantic Expedition described in the next section.
Multidisciplinary – Four projects developed by the participants can be described as multidisciplinary, using a comprehensive, multiyear approach to map and characterize deep-sea coral habitat, conduct research, and in one case, to establish long-term monitoring.
See Appendix C for individual project descriptions.
13
Participants discussed and described an International Transatlantic Expedition to explore deep-sea coral habitats in relation to the Gulf Stream and associated currents. The participants also identified specific objectives for the expedition. Most importantly, participants recognized that to be successful, these objectives must be simple, straightforward, and very clear. The concept of using this expedition to promote other site-specific missions related to deep-sea corals was also discussed, and it was agreed that this was a viable approach. Furthermore, participants discussed establishing consistent methods in terms of data collection and summary product development, and the group agreed that this would be critical not only for the expedition, but for meeting the requirements of an International Deep-Sea Corals Action Plan.
The Concept – The Transatlantic Expedition to explore and research deep-sea coral habitats of the Gulf Stream would be an integrated exploration and research program with broad public appeal that represents an effective, efficient, and innovative way to better understand and manage underwater resources. The International Transatlantic Expedition would consist of integrated, multi-disciplinary cruises, using common protocols and multiple partners at targeted sites to support science-based discovery and characterization. By using the expeditionary approach, expedition participants could address the realities and expectations of today’s funding environment ― “do more with less” and “capture the public’s attention.”
The Objectives – The International Transatlantic Expedition would provide an opportunity for participants to address a suite of complementary objectives related to (1) exploration and research, (2) education, (3) outreach and communications, (4) data management and mapping, and (5) the development of products that emphasize accomplishments. The objectives discussed at the workshop include:
Exploration and Research – explore dynamics and inter-dependencies of deep-sea coral habitat and biological communities through a multi-disciplinary approach using in situ underwater systems, pioneering acoustic and observational technologies, and traditional sampling methods.
Over-arching research objectives were cited at the workshop as appropriate to critical science and management needs in all regions of the expedition, including:
Ecology of deep-sea coral ecosystems:
14
Physiology of deep-sea corals:
Paleoceanography:
Education – immerse students, teachers, and marine educators through at-sea participation, links to shore-based classrooms, and expedition-based curricula.
Outreach – report stories of discovery, science, and management challenges through traditional (e.g., TV, newspapers, open houses) and multimedia (e.g., web sites, live satellite uplinks) outlets; develop an International Transatlantic Expedition Web Site that reports daily discoveries and findings through text, imagery, and sounds (e.g., expeditions at http://oceanexplorer.noaa.gov).
Data Management and Mapping – catalog and summarize all expedition discoveries, activities, data, samples, video tapes, and photos; overlay high-resolution bathymetry (e.g., side-scan, multibeam) with submersible tracks, habitat features and biological communities, as well as real-time on board mapping for areas where little or no high-resolution bathymetry exists.
Application of Results – develop mix of products for different target audiences, both real-time (during the expeditions), short-term (immediately after the expeditions), and over the long-term; focus on products that have a direct application to improving management of ocean resources.
Preparing for a Transatlantic Expedition that could involve several ships, submersibles, ROVs, AUVs, and other equipment will require a great amount of planning and preliminary work. Although not discussed at the workshop, the following outline is offered by NOAA as a potential method for organizing the expedition:
15
16
The participants recognized that developing an integrated approach to locate, study, and manage deep-sea corals requires the support of the relevant governments, the science community, natural resource managers, industry, and the general public. Therefore, they identified events where the approaches described in this report could be communicated and discussed. They also identified existing products that describe deep-sea corals and the threats they face, as well as aquaria and displays that convey similar messages (Tables 5 - 7).
Table 5. Upcoming events where presentations on deep-sea corals may prove useful for establishing formal collaborations.
Year Month Activity Location
| 2003 | March | U.S. Congress - House Ocean Caucus Luncheon | US: Washington, D.C. |
| 2003 | April | Global Ecology and Oceanography of Harmful Algal Blooms (GEOHAB) | Tazmania |
| 2003 | April | EGS-AGU-EUG Joint Assembly | France: Nice |
| 2003 | Spring | Fisheries Exhibition | Scotland: Glasgow |
| 2003 | June | UN Meeting: Law of the Sea | US: New York |
| 2003 | June | Workshop on the Governance of High Seas Biodiversity Conservation | Australia: Cairns |
| 2003 | July | 7th International Conference on Colenterate Biology | US: Lawrence, Kansas |
| 2003 | August | American Fisheries Society (MPA Component) | Canada: Quebec |
| 2003 | August | Deep-Sea Biology Symposium | US: Oregon |
| 2003 | September | Second International Symposium on Deep-Sea Corals | Germany: Erlangen |
| 2003 | September | Ocean Margins Research Conference | France: Paris |
| 2003 | November | Geological Survey of Ireland Seminar | Ireland: Dublin |
| 2003 | September | International Council for the Exploration of the Seas | Estonia |
| 2003 | December | New Zealand Deep-Sea Fisheries | Queenstown, New Zealand |
| 2004 | June | 10th International Coral Reef Symposium | Japan: Okinawa |
| 2004 | Unknown | EurOcean: marine science and ocean technology | Ireland: Galway |
| 2004 | Unknown | GEOHAB | Ireland: Galway |
| 2005 | Unknown | International Society for Reef Studies Regional Meetings | Unknown |
| Unknown | Unknown | Irish Coral Task Force | Unknown |
th
Note: The House Oceans Caucus Luncheon was conducted on March 14 , 2003.
Table 6. Products that describe deep-sea corals and the threats they face.
| National Geographic special on Ireland's deep-sea corals | Video | Ireland and Germany |
|---|---|---|
| "Out in Nature" - The effects of trawling on deep-sea corals | Video | Norway |
| Geological Survey of Ireland - seabed survey | Book and Maps | Ireland |
| "Deep Water Corals and Process in the Seafloor" | Book | Norway |
| "Proceedings of the 1st International Symposium on Deep-Sea Corals" | Book | Canada |
17
Table 7. A few examples of aquaria and exhibits that highlight deep-sea corals.
Title or Description Country
| Smithsonian Marine Station | United States |
|---|---|
| Florida Aquarium | United States |
| Monterey Bay Aquarium | United States |
| Mystic Aquarium and Institute for Exploration | United States |
| National Museum of Canada | Canada |
| tish Deep-Sea ExperienceScot | United Kingdom |
The following is a list of potential actions that could be undertaken to make progress on improving integrated efforts focusing on deep-sea co rals. They are organized according to the sections of the report.
18
19
On the final day of the workshop, the group discussed information needs with regard to formalizing deep-sea coral research and conservation efforts. A strong push for public awareness (illustrating the values and threats to these environments) was recommended. Several participants suggested that the conservation of deep-sea corals through the development of an International Deep-Sea Corals Action Plan could result in a new paradigm for implementing ocean management strategies to protect habitats that fall outside the scope of any one nation’s political jurisdiction. Such a plan could emphasize an ecosystem management approach for the benefit of multiple species, while still integrating actions focusing on single species that are facing critical declines. In an effort to maintain some momentum on three distinct but related paths – engendering political and institutional support, developing a State of the Deep-Sea Corals Report and an International Deep-Sea Corals Action Plan, and planning for an International Transatlantic Expedition – participants identified a list of Additional Information Needs:
During the workshop, a discussion regarding marine protected areas (MPAs) and their designation to protect deep-sea corals habitat generated a large amount of interest from participants. Information regarding the potential types of legislation that may help develop MPAs for deep-sea corals habitat is listed for each region:
Europe – Within the EU, the primary mechanism for establishing an MPA for deep-sea corals habitat falls under the EU Habitats Directive. This Directive protects aquatic species and their habitats; and supports the development of a network of Special Areas of Conservation (SACs). SACs have the potential to include some areas of known deep-sea corals. In addition, the EUs Common Fisheries Policy governs exploitation of living marine resources and can prohibit destructive fishing practices in areas that are known to contain deep-sea corals.
Canada – Canada’s Ocean Act (1996) gives the Canada Department of Fisheries and Oceans the authority to establish MPAs to preserve and protect unique habitats, endangered and threatened species and their habitats, marine areas of high biodiversity or productivity, and other areas of the marine environment that may require special protection. For example, in Georges Bank, Nova Scotia, the Canadian government closed a 424km2 area to bottom-impacting gear that included an area closure to protect deep-sea corals. This closure occurred as part of the 2002
20
Management Plan for Georges Bank groundfish. Recently, in March 2003, the Minister of Fisheries and Oceans Canada announced the designation of Endeavor Hydrothermal Vents as Canada’s first MPA.
United States – In the U.S., habitat can be protected through several pieces of legislation, including the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act (Magnuson-Stevens Act), the Endangered Species Act, the Marine Mammal Protection Act, and the Nationa l Marine Sanctuaries Act. The Magnuson-Stevens Act requires NOAA Fisheries to identify essential fish habitat (EFH) for federally managed marine fish a nd shellfish stocks and to regulate fishing gear that reduces EFH. EFH is defined as habitat that is necessary for a species full life cycle (spawning, breeding, feeding, or growth to maturity). There are several different des ignations that NOAA can use to close a particular ha bitat:
(3 ) Protected Resource Zones;
*The only area in the U.S. that was specific ally closed to help protect a species of deep-sea corals is the Oculina Banks HAPC. The Oculina Banks HAPC prohibits bottom trawling, dredging, and placing fishing pots and traps on the seafloor to protect the unique ivory tree coral (Oculina varicosa).
Executive Order (EO) 13158 signed by President Clinton on May 26, 2000 and endorsed by Commerce Secretary Evans in 2002 called for the creation of a national network of MPAs in the United States. As a part of EO 13158, a web site, mpa.gov, was launched. Mpa.gov is the venue that houses all information related to the EO and will eventually hou se an inventory of all marine managed areas. The Inventory of Marine Managed Areas will include federal, state, local or tr ibal areas that are regulated by law and have defined boundaries. See Table 8 below for a list of the eleven NOAA managed MPAs on the east coast o f the U.S.
Table 8. List of MPAs on the U.S. east coast managed by NOAA.
| Site Name | US Region |
| NE Multispecies Closed Area I (portion of George’s Bank) | North Atlantic |
| NE Multispecies Closed Area II (portion of George’s Bank) | North Atlantic |
| NE Multispecies Nantucket Lightship Closed Area | North Atlantic |
| Gerry E. Studds/Stellwagen Bank National Marine Sanctuary | North Atlantic |
| Flower Garden Banks National Marine Sanctuary | Western Gulf of Mexico |
| Desoto Canyon Closed Area | Eastern Gulf of Mexico |
| Madison-Swanson Spawning Site | Eastern Gulf of Mexico |
| Steamboat Lumps Spawning Site | Eastern Gulf of Mexico |
| Experimental Oculina Research Reserve | South Atlantic |
| Oculina Bank Habitat Area of Particular Concern | South Atlantic |
| Tortugas Shrimp Sanctuary | South Atlantic |
21
For more information regarding U.S. MPAs:
22
The Deep-Sea Corals Workshop provided an opportunity for a group of deep-sea coral researchers to discuss the need for an International Deep-Sea Corals Action Plan, identify critical information needs to increase our understanding of deep-sea coral ecosystems, and to identify potential collaborative efforts. The participants in the three working groups (i.e., Mapping, Biology and Ecology, and Paleoclimate Analyses) worked tirelessly to complete the many tasks put before them and their efforts are encapsulated in this document.
Accomplishments from the workshop include:
23
Deep-Sea Corals Workshop –Summary Report
OBJECTIVES – The objectives of this workshop are to:
8:00 BEGIN DAY 1 – Coffee
8:30 Opening (Geoff O’Sullivan and Stephen Brown)
8:50 Review the Agenda – Meeting Objectives and Organization (Anthony Grehan and John McDonough)
9:10 Round robin Introduction
9:20 Prelude – State-of-the-Art Summaries
10:10 BREAK - Coffee
10:30 Part I – Develop an outline for a “Deep-Sea Corals Action Plan” (Plenary)
11:30 Part II – Develop an outline for a “State of Deep-Sea Corals Report” (Plenary)
12:30 LUNCH
1:30 Part III – Develop descriptions of common themes (Breakout Groups)
4:10 BREAK – Regroup in plenary
4:30 Breakout groups present descriptions to the entire group (Plenary)
5:30 Discuss accomplishments, next steps, and agreements (Plenary)
6:00 END OF DAY 1
24
Deep-Sea Corals Workshop –Summary Report
DAY 1 Products:
8:30 BEGIN DAY 2 – Coffee
9:00 Review Day 1 Accomplishments – Review the Agenda for Day 2 (Anthony Grehan and John McDonough)
9:30 Part I – Develop list of collaborative projects for 2003 (Plenary)
10:00 Part II – Prioritize collaborative projects for 2003 (Plenary)
• Develop a “short list” of projects based on applied criteria, i.e: − Addresses a critical issue − Addresses a critical gap − High potential for collaboration − Expected to result in information useful for the “Action Plan” − Financially feasible
10:30 BREAK - Coffee
11:00 Part III – Develop detailed descriptions of priority projects (Breakout Groups)
1:00 LUNCH
2:00 Continue Part III
4:00 BREAK – Coffee (Regroup in plenary)
4:30 Breakout groups present project descriptions to the entire group (Plenary)
5:30 Discuss accomplishments, next steps, and agreements (Plenary)
6:00 END OF DAY 2
DAY 2 Products:
25
This Appendix contains the detailed notes of the work conducted by each of the three breakout groups – (1) Mapping the Distribution and Abundance of Deep-Sea Corals; (2) Biology of Deep-sea Coral Ecosystems; and (3) Paleoclimate Analysis. Each of the groups was required to: 1) refine the overview statement that described their working group “theme”; 2) identify objectives for the theme (optional; not all groups listed objectives); 3) identify information needs required for making progress on their theme; and 4) further describe what the group considered to be the most “critical” information needs (i.e., those that need to be addressed as soon as possible).
In the growing research field of deep-sea corals, there is a significant need to build an information base. As a first step, deep-sea corals need to be located, charted, and their distribution and abundance estimated. The integration of GIS mapping into this process would be a useful way to synthesize the information and show the locations of research and monitoring stations, deep-sea coral habitat, and commercial fishing areas.
4. CRITICAL INFORMATION NEEDS:
Low-resolution mapping needs to be done in many places, except for Ireland, since they have already done much of this in their own waters. The United States may need this type of work the most, as well as the continental shelf and margins off Norway. Specific regions however, were chosen for this type of mapping based on the following criteria:
Based on these criteria, the following areas were chosen as a sampling of the possible initial locations to perform low-resolution mapping:
The following technologies are required to meet this critical information need:
This work would probably be best conducted sometime from April – September. The times however would depend on the specific sites and their regional climate.
This information would be useful for almost everyone, including international organizations.
Critical Contributors:
| Institution | Contribution |
| NOAA, U.S. Geological Survey | Funds, equipment |
| Commercial companies | Equipment |
| Oil and gas (MAREANO: Marine Area Database for the Norwegian Sea) | Data |
| Navy | Equipment, |
| expertise | |
| European Union | Large-scale |
| funding | |
| Cable, communications companies | Data |
| Academia | Equipment, |
| expertise | |
| Canadian Hydrographic Survey | Data |
Specific regions were chosen for high-resolution mapping based on the following criteria:
Based on these criteria, the following areas were chosen as a sampling of the possible initial locations to perform resolution-resolution mapping:
The following technologies are required to meet this critical information need:
This work would probably be best conducted sometime from April – September. The specific times however would depend on the specific sites and their regional climate. There must be good weather/conditions to conduct this type of work.
The users would be everyone. It would be especially good to show high quality images acquired in these ways to get the public excited about deep-sea corals. This could translate into political pressure and potentially more funding.
Critical Contributors:
| Institution | Contribution |
| NOAA (through NOAA’s Undersea Research Program and the Office of Ocean Exploration) | Funds, equipment (ROVs, AUVs, & submersibles) |
| U.S. Geological Survey | Acoustic profiling |
| European universities | Large-scale equipment |
| European Union | Large-scale funding |
| Cable, communications companies | Data |
| Academia | Equipment, expertise |
| Canadian Hydrographic Survey | Data |
| Oil and gas companies | Data |
Group 2: Biology of Deep-Sea Coral Ecosystems
A. Physiological ecology of habitat-forming coral species
Improving the basic knowledge of deep-sea coral physiological ecology is a significant need to better understand these organisms. Several fundamental questions have yet to be answered regarding the physiology of deep-sea corals. What controls growth and development? Improving the knowledge of coral biology as it relates to feeding, behavior, and genetics is a priority to better understand these organisms. What are the abiotic and biotic factors that influence reproduction and dispersal? How do abiotic and biotic factors affect deep-sea coral distribution and abundance and their associated flora and fauna? In situ experiments and those using aquaria may provide insight into the sensitivities and tolerance of deep-sea corals to anthropogenic changes.
B. Ecology of Deep-Sea Coral Communities
Deep-sea coral habitat supports a diverse array of fish and invertebrate species. Current research interests are to assess reef biodiversity, food web relationships, and the importance of deep-sea corals as refugia for fish and invertebrates to spawn, breed, feed, and grow to maturity. There is a need to describe the diversity of associated fauna and the role that deep-sea habitat plays in their life histories (growth rates, age of sexual maturity, fecundity, spawning frequency, and recruitment).
C. Biogeographic and Taxonomic Studies
Many deep-sea coral and associated fauna species and species complexes are still unknown. In addition, biogeography and its driving processes also remain poorly understood. Taxonomic expertise needs to be developed. Molecular genetic studies may provide insight into measuring coral larval dispersal. Genetic studies may be used to compare corals and associated fauna both regionally, as well as trans-Atlantic.
Note: Based on the results of the Deep-Sea Corals Collaboration Planning Meeting held in Tampa, three common themes (taxonomy, physiology, and ecology) were to be discussed independently of one another. However, prior to this workshop, a decision was made to consider the three common themes within one working group. After some discussion, the working group agreed to create an overarching heading (i.e., Biology of Deep-Sea Coral Ecosystems) that would incorporate all three common themes as subtopics. Additionally, it was suggested by the working group that there was a significant need for an additional common theme entitled “Characterization of the Physical and Chemical Environment”. This common theme would enable us to address the development of new tools to assess, characterize, monitor, etc. The group agreed that it is a context from which every common theme, and the topics within them, would benefit.
2. OBJECTIVES:
None stated.
3. LIST OF INFORMATION NEEDS:
A. Physiological ecology of habitat-forming coral species
B. Ecology of Deep-Sea Coral Communities
C. Biogeographic and Taxonomic Studies
4. CRITICAL INFORMATION NEEDS:
Note: To describe the whole life span of a polyp, we need to understand deep-sea coral growth rates. The working group discussed the potential cross over of interests and objectives with Group 3: Paleoclimate Analysis. Also, the group discussed that this critical information need could be listed within the “Characterization of the Physical and Chemical Environment” theme recommended by this group as an addition to the common themes list.
Geography:
Efforts should be focused in the following regions:
Specific sites were chosen based on ease of sampling:
Technology:
The following technologies are required to meet this critical information need:
Timing and Duration:
Ideally, information should be collected spanning all months of the year. It will require several years to collect this data. Additionally, short-term lab studies will be necessary to calibrate field-collected data.
Users:
Critical Contributors:
| Institution | Contribution |
| NOAA’s Undersea Research Program National Science Foundation | Funds, Equipment |
| Scottish Association for Marine Science | Growth/Budgets |
| Oregon Institute of Marine Biology, Southampton | |
| Oceanography Centre, University of South Hampton, University | Reproduction |
| of Maine |
Geography:
The location of this work should be based on ongoing efforts and along a latitudinal gradient.
Technology:
Timing and Duration:
This may be ecosystem-dependent (e.g., fish aggregations/spawning on Oculina Banks happen in February - March; there are spring phytoplankton blooms/surface productivity and seasonally-dependent fish associations).
Users:
• Scientific Community.
Critical Contributors:
The main funding arena for this theme will be fishery-related.
Institution Contribution
University of Maine, University of Essential Fish Habitat
Connecticut McMaster University and Dalhousie Food web, Stable Isotope Genetics
University University of Groningen (RUG) Trophic Diversity Scottish Association for Marine Science Deep-sea Fisheries & Species Interactions University of Liverpool Isotopes & Lipid Biomarkers University of North Carolina at Wilmington
Food Web
& Florida State University Monterey Bay Aquarium Research Institute Stable Isotopes & Lipid Biomarkers Institute of Marine Research, Norway Fish Habitat & Community Analysis National University of Ireland, Galway; Irish
Stable Isotopes & Fisheries Marine Institute
Geography:
• Global.
Technology:
Taxonomic expertise:
The working group discussed the need for a mechanism(s) for sending specimens to experts. The idea is develop a clearinghouse to prevent deep-sea coral taxonomy experts from being overwhelmed with samples to identify. The bulk of reef species could be assigned to local scientists, saving the difficult species for taxonomists.
Timing and Duration:
This is not relevant to this critical need.
Users:
Critical Contributors:
The deficit in capable taxonomists is an issue that continues to be raised at European Union meetings, but at present no money is available.
| Institution | Contribution |
| Smithsonian Institution | Taxonomists and repository |
| National University of Ireland, Galway; Census of Marine | Taxonomy and data collecting |
| Life | |
| National Institute for Undersea Science and Technology at | National repository for collecting |
| the University of Mississippi | and cataloging biological, |
| taxonomic, genomic, and | |
| chemical data of organisms. | |
| University of Charleston | Molecular systematics |
| University of Galway | Deep-sea species |
| Oil & Gas industry, National Science Foundation | Funding of taxonomy fellowships |
Group 3: Paleoclimate Analysis
1. OVERVIEW STATEMENT:
Paleo-retrospective and prospective analysis may be a tool to separate natural oscillations versus anthropogenic effects. Information derived from paleontological studies will allow modelers to assess climate change. Paleontological studies will also assist fisheries managers to determine whether any changes seen in fish stock assessments are likely a result of natural variations in climatic, oceanographic conditions, and/or anthropogenic stressors.
Note: Why use deep-sea corals as paleoclimate proxies?
2. OBJECTIVES:
Overarching Goal: To model and predict future climate changes by ascertaining past environmental conditions through retrospective analysis.
environmental event (e.g. oceanographic/atmospheric process) occurring in one place also shows up in another (e.g. African dust).
3. LIST OF INFORMATION NEEDS:
4. CRITICAL INFORMATION NEEDS:
Geography:
A Gulf Stream transect is necessary. Possible sampling sites for a Gulf Stream expedition include the following:
Technology:
The following technologies are required to meet this critical information need:
Timing and Duration:
This work needs to be performed only once and can happen at any time of year.
Users:
There are several different users who could use this information.
Critical Contributors:
Category not discussed at workshop.
Geography:
• Global.
Technology:
The following technologies are required to meet this critical information need:
Timing and Duration:
The fieldwork should be performed sometime within the months of July - September. One successful trip would be sufficient, but coral survival is important.
Critical Contributors:
Category not discussed at workshop.
Geography:
• Gulf Stream.
Timing and Duration:
The longest available time series should be acquired.
Users:
There are several different users who could use this information.
Critical Contributors:
Category not discussed at workshop.
During the first day of the workshop, participants were divided into breakout groups where they identified current and proposed projects relating to deep-sea corals. The individual who identified each project was then asked on the second day to further describe their project(s). This information was collected through a questionnaire onto which the participants hand-wrote the details of their project. The table that follows is a compilation of the most salient points of these projects and includes the following categories grouped under the most relevant common theme:
| | Timing: When the projects will/may take place. This category is divided into 2003 |
|---|---|
| projects and future projects. | |
| | Location: The region of study is categorized as U.S., Canada, Europe, and Multi- |
| regional. The four categories may be further described by specific sites or reefs. | |
| | Description: Very brief abstract of the project. |
| | Key Activities: Brief descriptions of the primary activities that will take place |
| during the project. | |
| | Contact: Principal- or Co-Investigator of the project or an individual with |
| information on the project |